• How to defeat North Korea.

    • .
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/06/2017 04:09 AM - Hide
    • supposedly they have one super trev over there that is responsible for all the rapid success they've had with their nuke program. Just pop him and then the Norks won't be able to retaliate since their missiles will fall apart on the pad.
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Once Upon a God Flogger
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/06/2017 11:09 PM - Hide
    • . posted:
      It's telling that apparently it's impossible for you to find a sane and believable source to back up your unhinged rantings. Your latest 'source' is a blog post by a Mr. Abel Cohen who rants and rages and makes lots of unfounded accusations. But the meat of his loony screed will surprise exactly no one: he attempts to lay blame for the 'shoah' at America's feet. Yes, he's yet another screeching jew who is absolutely sure that America is at fault...for something, but he of course is all conspiracy theory and no proof.

      So what does that bring your total to...let's see...ah yes, you're now 0-3 with your lame attempts to smear the greatest nation the world has ever seen. You should be ashamed of yourself, but the mentally incompetent rarely understand what they're doing.

      Putting it another way: America 3 - Jealous Non-American 0

      America WINS AGAIN!

      Yep, the Sepps won WW2 alright. I freely admit they beat the shit outta less than half the Japanese, and even less of the German forces, in the last few months of WW2! Mainly from as far away from the Huns and Japs as their unchallenged air forces and their zillions of artillery pieces could keep them!

      And the German formations they eventually beat were made up of pensioners, amputees, children, sandbagged non-German conscripts, the shell-shocked demoralised left-overs of decimated divisions from the Russian Front, and the last desperate dregs of German manpower. Even then, every time the Mighty Mouths met the Germans on anything like an equal footing, the Huns wiped the floor with them.

      If only Bubbalonians could actually fight like they do with their interminably bragging self-aggrandizing mouths and their we-won-ALL-the-wars movies!

      The average Sepp couldn't knock a sick moll off of a piss pot without softening her up with a 20 squadron B52 strike and a 24-hour artillery bombardment by a billion big guns.

      posted:
      I am suggesting that total American contribution to ground combat is vastly exaggerated by most of the literature. Through the war as a whole it amounted to about a quarter of the Western Allied total all up. Until mid to late 1944, the American contribution was minimal, and could have been replaced with other troops. In Europe their contribution really became important starting in June 1944, and in Asia starting November 1944. (But by 1944 there were more French and Italian and Indian and Polish volunteers than could be trained and equipped, so an idle side thought is that perhaps a lot of this American manpower might have been more valuably deployed as an arsenal of democracy workforce from 1942 - 1945, rather than spending years in training as infantry divisions that only got into action in 1945?) It was not until the end of 1944 when the large majority of American divisions started to make their presence felt worldwide (well, Northern Europe and the Pacific at least, if still not the Mediterannean, Middle Eastern or mainland Asian theatre's)... at about the time when the European battles were mostly won, when Germany was already falling apart, and when Japan was trying to get the Soviet Union to be a go between in surrender discussions.

      As usual, the problem is beware of statistics. Impressive sounding numbers of divisions do not necessarily relate to an actual combat value, particularly if they are not often in action. In terms of contributing to winning the war Chinese 'divisions' were a joke, Russian 'divisions' were an exaggeration, and the vast majority of American divisions were too late to see fighting in the critical years - early 1942 to late 1944 - when the tide was turned.
      http://rethinkinghistory.blogspot.com.au/2011/02/statistical-confusion-whose-troops.html
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • .
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/06/2017 11:30 PM - Hide
    • America would get slaughtered in a war there. That's why they stick to bombing stone age goat herders, that's all they are capable of 'winning'
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Q.nli
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/07/2017 12:41 AM - Hide

    • Ah yes, it's yet another blog masquerading as an objective purveyor of history, but, curiously, there's always an anti-American slant.

      So I looked at another blog post on the site & it's concerned with a favourite topic of the eternally jealous anti-American fools: Olympic Medal Counts.

      The obviously butt hurt author wrote this:

      "The United States with way more than twice the population and close to three times the combined GDP, of the rest of the 'old' Anglosphere nations* - Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland - still gets less medals (121) than the others (144)."

      But then an interested reader replied with this:

      "Apples and Oranges. Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland sent more than twice as many athletes to the Olympics. Despite having less than half the populace, they sent 1378.

      America sent 588. America sent less, but of higher quality.

      In an apples to apples comparison? Per capita like GDP?

      The United States would be allowed to send 3,500 of its best athletes to the Olympics. Or the rest of the Anglosphere would be similarly hamstrung by a new qualification regime to 240 athletes.

      The results would be rather obvious, of course.

      Needless to say, competitions are as much about probabilities and chance as they are of skill; having a larger number of participants ensures that more non-Americans will medal based simply on the number of times you can roll the dice.

      So the disparate number of athletes allowed to "qualify" from the United Sates has nothing to do with the rest of the Anglosphere having better athletes than Americans.

      It is not unusual, after all, for American athletes of dual citizenship to try to qualify for lesser competition in other countries. In fact, a large plurality of the world's athletes are trained in the United States and by Americans, which takes resources away from developing its own athletes due to the slanted qualifying system. But it is roundly acknowledged that making the American team is a far higher bar in most sports than making the Canadian team.

      I need not write the book about how or why, economically and politically, the current system in place "must" ensure that certain countries' participation rates are artifically inflated while others are simiarly depressed. Most of those being cut out of Olympic competition are quite capable of out-competing the average British or Canadian or Australian if the normal prevalence of chance tips their way. But the point is that most of those cut will never have that opportunity.

      To the contrary, the qualification system in place is specifically designed so that the United States does not overwhelm the international Olympic competition.

      It's the "everybody gets a medal" mentality, and it makes the Olympics more fun for foreigners to watch. It has nothing to do with merit, and much to do with "skewed merit".

      There was a recent International Baseball Tournament that ended when the American team defeated the South Korean team. Despite the larger American population overall, and the American reputation for Baseball, the United States almost never wins this Baseball tournament. Supposedly, the victory was somewhat pyrrhic, considering the United States should defeat the South Koreans given its "bigger population".

      So Americans are objectively inferior at Baseball the international narrative goes...until you looked into the details of the qualifying system.

      The South Korean team drew from a population pool of hundreds of thousands of Koreans. The American team that eventually won the championship came from a little town with a population pool of less than 17,000.

      The Americans are broken up into - literally - thousands of weaker teams, whereas the South Korean teams sport typically bigger population chunks, often a magnitude or two bigger. The district mapping of particular foreign teams is extremely slanted.

      Yes, the qualifying regime is a decisive factor for why the Americans rarely win the Baseball Tournament - not because they are bad at Baseball, but because Americans "must" be hamstrung. And the same is true for every qualifying system for most Olympic sports in the US from Track to Curling."
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Q.nli
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/07/2017 12:50 AM - Hide
    • Once Upon a God Flogger posted:
      OH MAH GUARD! NON-MURKUN TROOPS KILLED MORE JAPANESE TROOPS THAN THE MIGHTY MOUTHS DID IN WW2!.... AND MURKA ONLY EVER TOOK ON LESS THAN HALF OF THE JAP FORCES!!
      http://www.japanww2.com/wt19.htm

      THIS DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS THE ENDLESS WE-WON-WW2-SINGLEHANDEDLY WAR MOVIES THAT EVERY MERKIN WAS BOUGHT UP ON! THEREFORE IT JUST HAS TO BE A CHRIST-DENYIN' COMMIE LIE!

      That sites ADMITS that the statistics it uses are unreliable.

      You simply can't catch a break, eh? You wish, you want, you NEED to denigrate the US to prop up your poor self-esteem concerning your own country, but it's a difficult thing to do. Never has the world seen such greatness as that exhibited by the incomparable and magnificent United States of America.

      Sucks to be you!
      \
      :emma:
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Once Upon a God Flogger
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/07/2017 12:52 AM - Hide
    • Q.nli posted:
      Ah yes, it's yet another blog masquerading as an objective purveyor of history, but, curiously, there's always an anti-American slant.

      So I looked at another blog post on the site & it's concerned with a favourite topic of the eternally jealous anti-American fools: Olympic Medal Counts.

      The obviously butt hurt author wrote this:

      "The United States with way more than twice the population and close to three times the combined GDP, of the rest of the 'old' Anglosphere nations* - Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland - still gets less medals (121) than the others (144)."

      But then an interested reader replied with this:

      "Apples and Oranges. Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Ireland sent more than twice as many athletes to the Olympics. Despite having less than half the populace, they sent 1378.

      America sent 588. America sent less, but of higher quality.

      In an apples to apples comparison? Per capita like GDP?

      The United States would be allowed to send 3,500 of its best athletes to the Olympics. Or the rest of the Anglosphere would be similarly hamstrung by a new qualification regime to 240 athletes.

      The results would be rather obvious, of course.

      Needless to say, competitions are as much about probabilities and chance as they are of skill; having a larger number of participants ensures that more non-Americans will medal based simply on the number of times you can roll the dice.

      So the disparate number of athletes allowed to "qualify" from the United Sates has nothing to do with the rest of the Anglosphere having better athletes than Americans.

      It is not unusual, after all, for American athletes of dual citizenship to try to qualify for lesser competition in other countries. In fact, a large plurality of the world's athletes are trained in the United States and by Americans, which takes resources away from developing its own athletes due to the slanted qualifying system. But it is roundly acknowledged that making the American team is a far higher bar in most sports than making the Canadian team.

      I need not write the book about how or why, economically and politically, the current system in place "must" ensure that certain countries' participation rates are artifically inflated while others are simiarly depressed. Most of those being cut out of Olympic competition are quite capable of out-competing the average British or Canadian or Australian if the normal prevalence of chance tips their way. But the point is that most of those cut will never have that opportunity.

      To the contrary, the qualification system in place is specifically designed so that the United States does not overwhelm the international Olympic competition.

      It's the "everybody gets a medal" mentality, and it makes the Olympics more fun for foreigners to watch. It has nothing to do with merit, and much to do with "skewed merit".

      There was a recent International Baseball Tournament that ended when the American team defeated the South Korean team. Despite the larger American population overall, and the American reputation for Baseball, the United States almost never wins this Baseball tournament. Supposedly, the victory was somewhat pyrrhic, considering the United States should defeat the South Koreans given its "bigger population".

      So Americans are objectively inferior at Baseball the international narrative goes...until you looked into the details of the qualifying system.

      The South Korean team drew from a population pool of hundreds of thousands of Koreans. The American team that eventually won the championship came from a little town with a population pool of less than 17,000.

      The Americans are broken up into - literally - thousands of weaker teams, whereas the South Korean teams sport typically bigger population chunks, often a magnitude or two bigger. The district mapping of particular foreign teams is extremely slanted.

      Yes, the qualifying regime is a decisive factor for why the Americans rarely win the Baseball Tournament - not because they are bad at Baseball, but because Americans "must" be hamstrung. And the same is true for every qualifying system for most Olympic sports in the US from Track to Curling."

      By trying to change the subject from what unbelievably brave world beaters Bubbalonians are to "basebarl" tells me you've finally accepted the Reich played a minority and cowardly role in the fighting in both world wars. Good.
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Q.nli
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/07/2017 01:03 AM - Hide
    • Once Upon a God Flogger posted:
      By trying to change the subject from what unbelievably brave world beaters Bubbalonians are to "basebarl" tells me you've finally accepted the Reich played a minority and cowardly role in the fighting in both world wars. Good.

      Sorry, tiger. You're gonna have to do better than crazy rants on blogs as a source for your anti-American jihad.

      That's right, fire up the American search engine and frantically try to find a source not staffed by the loon brigade. Have at it!

      :snicker:
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Once Upon a God Flogger
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/07/2017 01:20 AM - Hide
    • Q.nli posted:
      That sites ADMITS that the statistics it uses are unreliable.

      You simply can't catch a break, eh? You wish, you want, you NEED to denigrate the US to prop up your poor self-esteem concerning your own country, but it's a difficult thing to do. Never has the world seen such greatness as that exhibited by the incomparable and magnificent United States of America.

      Sucks to be you!
      \
      :emma:

      These facts are undeniable: the Reich didn't get into the war against Germany until Germany's armed forces were literally on the ropes, if not flat out on the canvas. http://www.historynet.com/triumph-at-kasserine-pass.htm The Russians had the Hun on the run before your typically gutless Kassarene debacle.

      The Reich really only beat Japan's Navy. Most of its army was fighting in Asia from 1931 to 1945, not in the Pacific where the Sepponese force's war was almost exclusively fought. Everybody, including the Japs, knew resource poor Japan never stood a snowball's chance in hell of beating the Reich. Japan's war aims were on the Asian mainland, which war mongering America was intent on having all to itself. This is what the war with Japan was all about.

      What the Reich did in both world wars is absolutely nothing to brag about.
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • .
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/07/2017 01:24 AM - Hide
    • How to win:

      1. Track fat-boy Kim.
      2. Drop fat-boy Donald on said Kim from a great height.

      Mission Accomplished!!!!!

      ;cornlol;
    • Permalink
        [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • .
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/07/2017 01:28 AM - Hide
    • . posted:
      How to win:

      1. Track fat-boy Kim.
      2. Drop fat-boy Donald on said Kim from a great height.

      Mission Accomplished!!!!!

      ;cornlol;

      ;dbthis;
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Q.nli
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/07/2017 02:13 AM - Hide
    • Once Upon a God Flogger posted:
      These facts are undeniable: the Reich didn't get into the war against Germany until Germany's armed forces were literally on the ropes, if not flat out on the canvas. http://www.historynet.com/triumph-at-kasserine-pass.htm The Russians had the Hun on the run before your typically gutless Kassarene debacle.

      The Reich really only beat Japan's Navy. Most of its army was fighting in Asia from 1931 to 1945, not in the Pacific where the Sepponese force's war was almost exclusively fought. Everybody, including the Japs, knew resource poor Japan never stood a snowball's chance in hell of beating the Reich. Japan's war aims were on the Asian mainland, which war mongering America was intent on having all to itself. This is what the war with Japan was all about.

      What the Reich did in both world wars is absolutely nothing to brag about.

      Nonsense. Someone has filled your easily-led-astray noggin with a bunch of anti-American propaganda and you've been upchucking the drivel forevermore. Now you're starting to choke on that bile because you simply cannot find anyone of repute to back the absurdities you spout.

      You're no better than a 2-bit conspiracy retardo.

      Anyone possessing a hint of intelligence understands that America not only won WWII, but it did so with great aplomb. Without America's dominant military to save the day, YOUR country's primary language would be Japanese!

      Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!
      \
      :emma:
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Once Upon a God Flogger
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 08:24 PM - Hide
    • Q.nli posted:
      Nonsense. Someone has filled your easily-led-astray noggin with a bunch of anti-American propaganda and you've been upchucking the drivel forevermore. Now you're starting to choke on that bile because you simply cannot find anyone of repute to back the absurdities you spout.

      You're no better than a 2-bit conspiracy retardo.

      Anyone possessing a hint of intelligence understands that America not only won WWII, but it did so with great aplomb. Without America's dominant military to save the day, YOUR country's primary language would be Japanese!

      Stick that in your pipe and smoke it!
      \
      :emma:

      I see quoting historical facts to you is like casting strawberries before a typically ignorant Seppo pig. But I understand, you notoriously stupid Sepps have been brainwashed to believe that your laughable, palpable bullshit war movies are not self-congratulatory propaganda, but historical documentaries. You fat fools have been fed so much bullshit about how inherently brave y'all are that every oxygen breathing morbidly obese Bubba in his mobility scooter imagines himself as John Wayne reborn!

      Nevertheless, it is undeniable that the Hun was on the run before you showboating Seppo poseurs ever set foot in Europe. Germany had lost 80% of its troops on the Russian Front before your first real offensive action (in Sicily) - which amounted to no more than a minor skirmish on the Russian Front.

      Face it, Festus, Bubbalonians have never beaten anyone of note by themselves. Even the "Cheese eatin' Surrender Monkeys" won your War of Independence for you: https://www.pri.org/stories/2014-07-04/how-french-won-american-revolution

      Bubbalonia is best known for beating up Easy Beat, defenceless, helpless, and Lilliputian nations with no hope of matching America's might. Check out this disgusting catalogue of American cowardice: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_at_war

      AMERICA ALWAYS CAREFULLY PICKS ITS MARK BEFORE ANY CONFLICT IT ENTERS. BOTH WORLD WARS ARE A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF YOUR FOUL WAR-PROFITEERING BEFORE YOU FINALLY ENTER THE FRAY TO CRAVENLY KICK THE ENEMIES CORPSES IN THE LAST FEW WEEKS OF THE WAR AND CASH IN ON YOUR ALLIES VICTORY.
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • .
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 08:26 PM - Hide
    • simple. send quence there to distract kim jong. plus, bonus factor is, they censor access to the internet, so no more Quence posts.
      think it over guys.

      nite crew.
    • Permalink
        [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • .
    • Fscking Moron
    • .
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 08:28 PM - Hide
    • . posted:
      simple. send quence there to distract kim jong. plus, bonus factor is, they censor access to the internet, so no more Quence posts.
      think it over guys.

      nite crew.

      ;akinsthis;
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Q.nli
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 08:38 PM - Hide
    • Once Upon a God Flogger posted:

      nations with no hope of matching America's might.

      FINALLY, you get something right and you're spot on the mark! Ever since we bravely and heroically won the War of Independence, no nation on Earth could stand up to the overwhelming strength and power of American righteousness.

      There have been many pretenders to the throne, but we are the best. We are Americans!
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Once Upon a God Flogger
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 09:01 PM - Hide
    • Q.nli posted:
      FINALLY, you get something right and you're spot on the mark! Ever since we bravely and heroically won the War of Independence, no nation on Earth could stand up to the overwhelming strength and power of American righteousness.

      There have been many pretenders to the throne, but we are the best. We are Americans!

      The self-professed Heavyweight champion of the world.....who has only ever beaten Featherweight paraplegics.
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Once Upon a God Flogger
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 09:03 PM - Hide
    • Once Upon a God Flogger posted:
      The self-professed Heavyweight champion of the world.....who has only ever beaten Featherweight paraplegics.

      BTW, get a bit of guts yerself, Quence, and stop hiding behind a nom de plume!
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Q.nli
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 09:04 PM - Hide
    • Once Upon a God Flogger posted:
      The self-professed Heavyweight champion of the world.....who has only ever beaten Featherweight paraplegics.

      Aha! I would have been shocked if you'd written something thoughtful. You're very good at meeting low expectations.
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • Once Upon a God Flogger
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 09:23 PM - Hide
    • Q.nli posted:
      Aha! I would have been shocked if you'd written something thoughtful. You're very good at meeting low expectations.
      Go back to gagging on your gigolo's black cark. You know, that sub-human Boong who filled your belly full of missing link arms and legs.
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
    • .
    • Fscking Moron
    • Re: How to defeat North Korea.
      Posted 09/08/2017 09:29 PM - Hide
    • Once Upon a God Flogger posted:
      Go back to gagging on your gigolo's black cark. You know, that sub-human Boong who filled your belly full of missing link arms and legs.

      Stay classy and please say hello for me to your head of state, the Queen Mum.

      Fortunately, in the greatest nation in world history, we (the USA) threw off those pesky monarchist shackles centuries ago. It's a wonderful feeling be able to enjoy freedom. I hope you get to experience it one day.
    •   [ Quote ] | [ Quote All ]
  • Join the discussion - There is no registration required!

Name: (Optional)
Save
Photo: (Optional)
Message: (0 / 16,384 chars)

If you want to embed media, just paste YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter, Instagram, Vine, Liveleak, Imgur (IMAGE or GIFV) links and they'll auto embed.
Pro tips: Click the angry emojis for popular emoticons/fomotes. Check the trending fomotes for new fomotes.
  • Leaked News:
  • Read Topic - BREAKING: North Korea Launches Missile; Japanese Govt. Warns Its Headed Towards Northern Japan
  • Read Topic - North Korea fires several missiles into East Sea, missile flies around 250km: S. Korean military
  • Read Topic - North Korean Defector, 'Treated Like Dirt' in South, Fights to Return And Posts on F169bbs.com Ridiculing "Weakwhytes"
  • Read Topic - United Nations Resolution is the single largest economic sanctions package ever on North Korea. Over one billion..
  • Read Topic - South Korean military says North Korea launches ballistic missile, part of a string of test-firings in recent months
  • Read Topic - South Korean new agency YTN is showing footage of an above ground nuclear weapons test that just occurred in North Korea
  • Read Topic - North Korea just conducted an above ground nuclear test. Pics coming in from South Korean YTN news
  • Read Topic - Both North and South Korea were very close to winning the Korean War