Law BBS

    • IT 3AM THE WITCHING HOUR
      core magnetic hysteresis magnetic susceptibility increases orbit is skewed aligment declined plane changes the left of mind
    • .
    • 4
    • 44
    • > 12/10/2017 05:15 AM : .
  • x
  • .
    • There is no COURT of PUBLIC OPINION inside of a COURT of LAW
      No one has ever been CONVICTED, PAID any kind of FINE, or has SERVED any TIME in JAIL, based on the COURT of PUBLIC OPINION~

      ... because the COURT of PUBLIC OPINION doesn't really exist in the "REAL WORLD"!

      ... and, furthermore, as usual CNN is pushing a FALSE NARRATIVE on JUDGE ROY MOORE, who is INNOCENT, until CONVICTED in a COURT of LAW!

      NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of AMERICAN CITIZENS
  • x
  • JUSTICE is BLIND
    • Court Reverses 'White Supremacist' Defamation Ruling
      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/04/black-woman-n-word-court-case

      https://www.tlnt.com/black-employee-wins-280000-for-racial-slurs-from-her-black-boss/

      But you can sue someone for calling you a "nigger" even if a black called another black the word.
    • .
    • 1
    • 48
    • > 10/29/2017 06:35 AM : .
  • x
  • .
    • MARK ANTHONY TRAINA's litigation against the hospital and staff is baseless and vexatious.
      Vexatious litigation

      From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

      PUBLIC NOTICE: MARK ANTHONY TRAINA has only FILED one LAWSUIT over the past 20-years, and he has not ever FILED any MERITLESS LEGAL MOTIONS, now PLEASE continue reading this LEGAL DEFINITION of Vexatious litigation, and then simply ask yourself this very simple question, based upon all these FACTS: Is MARK ANTHONY TRAINA a VEXATIOUS LITIGANT?

      Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought, regardless of its merits, solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of the judicial process and may result in sanctions against the offender.

      [continued]
  • x
  • d2m.nli
    • .
    • 12
    • 187
    • > 08/21/2017 03:59 AM : .
  • x
  • .
    • No evidence to indicate guilt but unable to prove innocence so...
      https://www.facebook.com/FreeScottPeterson/

      http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/292937-scott-peterson-was-innocent/

      http://www.sfgate.com/tv/article/TV-doc-makes-case-for-Scott-Peterson-s-innocence-11751867.php

      http://www.desertsun.com/story/life/entertainment/movies/film-festival/2016/04/02/amdocs-film-strongly-asserts-scott-petersons-innocence/82538608/

      [continued]
  • x
  • GruntledX
Tip: Hover over >> for last reply to thread preview.